THE SACRED
Excerpt from "Plant Medicine"
by Stephen Harrod Buhner
Our capacity to recognize and seek out the sacred is one
of the basic drives that makes up the fabric of a human
being and which has shaped our common human ancestry.
The sacred as I use it is more akin to the dictionary
definition of holy, "having divine nature or origin." It
must be recognized that because the sacred is made up of
both non-rational and non-linear elements, any reduction
to simple definitions always fails to capture its
essence. One must enter the realm of the sacred and
experience its transcendent nature to fully understand
it. There is a distinct reality that underlies all
religious articulations. It is this reality that, when
experienced, is felt to be the REAL, a deeper and more
meaningful reality than that we experience in our normal
day-to-day lives.
The maps that travelers create from their travels in
sacred domains, and the bureaucracy that springs up
around control over the map, make up the form and
substance of religious movements. The maps correspond to
specific lineages of religious or spiritual devotion.
All humans have a propensity for how they experience the
sacred. For example, human beings may experience the
sacred as a territory (Native Americans), as a
personification (Christians), or a state of mind
(Buddhists). This propensity for how one experiences the
sacred can lead to arguments (and sometimes wars) over
the correct way to experience the sacred, over "The
Way." But as the eminent religious historian, Mircea
Eliade, has said, "There are no definitional limits to
what forms the sacred can take."4 The manifestation of
the sacred, hierophany, may occur in any person, place
or thing. The sacred, by definition, can take any form.
Each religious articulation has its place within the
human frame. To claim superiority for a religious
expression is to claim the thumb superior to the
fingers, the foot superior to the leg. Each has its
necessary place and function. One must search for the
real center of religion and go beyond the linguistic
representations contained in religious maps. If one does
not, one finds the human, not the sacred.
The sacred has a dynamic aspect in that it has a
tendency to manifest itself of its own accord. It tends
to come into the world and make itself known. Further,
each incarnate form, each object of matter, has a
tendency to realize its archetypal, universal, sacred
meaning. These two tendencies— that of the sacred to
manifest itself and that of each incarnate form to
realize its deeper archetype—come together in such a way
that any object at any time can incorporate within
itself all the power of the holy. When the sacred
manifests itself in the world, something in the human
allows it to be immediately recognized. A part of the
human, most often a subconscious part, experiences the
sacred and says to the conscious mind, "that is the
REAL." The conscious mind is then made aware of that
which is beyond it and that from which it comes, the
sacred.
The intrusion of the sacred into human experience
represents a direct transmission of the REAL, a
transmission of God, Creator, Allah, Great Spirit. The
human who experiences this is made aware of a reality
that transcends the human and thus predates human
linguistic and cultural constructs. This presents
difficulties. How does one retain the memory and
experience of something that predates all things human?
To explain the experience and to retain memory of it,
human beings automatically structure the direct
experience of the sacred into internalized symbolic
constructs. Thus the sacred comes to be expressed in
visions, wondrous feelings, thoughts, and sometimes
smells and tastes. This is due to the nature of memory
patterning.
Human memory patterns are constructed of aspects of the
five senses,-that is, memories are encoded bits of
sights, sounds, smells, tastes, feelings. Thus the
experience of the sacred is translated into visions,
sounds, smells, tastes, and feelings even though the
sacred is both all and none of these things.
Examinations of the written and oral records of those
who encountered the sacred show that their experiences
were very rich and generally included all of the five
senses.5
Strong visionary experience is often accompanied by
imperatives for human conduct. Conveyed during contact
with the sacred, these imperatives often require the
person to whom they are given to act in a certain
manner, engage in a specific life work, or make changes
in lifestyle or behavior. Because these imperatives are
usually interpreted as language when experienced, they
most often take on the pattern of language that is
already encoded in the person receiving them. To make
the imperatives sensible people also interpret them
through previously learned cultural experiences and
values. Thus, if one is raised in a primarily Christian
environment, any direct experience of the divine will
often tend to take on Christian forms and symbols.
All these things—sensory memory bits, linguistic and
cultural structures that give the experience of the
sacred memory form—become symbols that contain in
themselves the capacity to reinvoke the original sacred
experience. Though these elements are used, the sacred
does not become only those things. Inherent in the
experience of the sacred is the memory of its
transcendent nature and humans, according to their
capacity, are forced to generate more powerful
constructs out of their own existing structures to
encompass the immense morphology of the sacred. In this
process it is not possible for the human to retain the
full experience of the sacred. It is too large a
territory. Even so, the human has been changed, is no
longer only secular, and the symbols retained point the
way to something other and more REAL than the human.
Within many cultures, the search for personal contact
with the sacred is an integral part of our maturation
and development. When contact with the sacred occurs,
its nature and content shapes the direction of that
person's life. It provides meaning by which that person
determines ethical and honorable behavior and life's
work. Further, frequent contact with the sacred through
personal visionary experience or community ritual gives
direction for the deepening of one's own spirituality
over time.
Though experiences of the sacred cover a wide spectrum
of styles the oldest and most widespread is
Earth-centered, or what is sometimes referred to as
pagan religion or nature mysticism.
|